patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Center For Public Integrity

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Public Integrity Group Gives South Carolina an 'F'

Palmetto State ranks last along with five others.

The Center for Public Integrity, a government watchdog group that monitors, among other things, transparency in campaign financing, has given South Carolina an “F” on its latest report card. The states were asked the five questions below and given grades on their responses: South Carolina received the lowest possible score, a zero. Only five other states were as low—Alabama, Indiana, New Mexico, New York and North Dakota. The report notes that most states have less stringent campaign finance reporting rules and they often receive less media coverage. View the full report here. In the Palmetto State, groups not linked to a candidate are not required to disclose how much was given to them or by whom. Nor are they required to disclose how …

Comment_arrow

stanley seigler

10:08 pm on Friday, May 17, 2013

@Tom Martin tom conflates issues...eg; it's not about which is the bluest state...so what MA/MD bluer than CA...so compare SC to MA/MD repeating some comments in post @drury: the original point was/is per capita economic, metrics, comparison between a redred state and a blublue state (eg, SC v MA, CA, MD)... might give pause to consider political leanings... this was clouded/lost in distractions…   more ›

Monday, March 19, 2012

S.C. Flunks State Integrity Report

South Carolina near the bottom for corruption risk

South Carolina ranks among the states most likely to suffer from government corruption, according to a study released Monday. The Palmetto State earned an "F" in the study, conducted by the Center for Public Integrity, because it lacked accountability, its ethics commission was deemed inadequate and campaign finance laws were not strict enough. "An undercurrent of fear and political interference bubbles throughout the state’s civil service, one that is shot through with cronyism and patronage," Corey Hutchins, the State Integrity Investigation reporter for South Carolina, wrote in his report. The report graded states on 14 categories from the public's ability to access information to internal auditing to legislative accountability. South …

Comment_arrow

Dr. John

7:28 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

Stanley, I do understand also that we are talking about personal tax rates and not corporate rates. But your remark about going back to the 1950's tax rates bothers me. You cannot choose just one aspect of a certain period such as tax rates. Although you disagree with the tax rates that have progressively lowered over the last 60 years, you are disregarding all of the progress, socially and …   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?
 
 

Videos